Every person , whether natural or juridical extradite redress in the courts of law for the imposition of justice in all given up situation . The court represented by the jurist is seen as the final arbiter who puts an end to some(prenominal)(prenominal) given controversy where twain parties lay down their positions and arguments and leaves it up to the judge to decide on the matter based on an intent and not subjective attitudeI agree with the above inverted comma that a strong duty of loyalty should be enforce only when it is transcend that the parties agree on it . When there is trig evidence to the contrary , the courts should not obligate the parties to perform any(prenominal) duty not agreed upon by the partiesIt would be an inequity to force a ships company who is not in snap with the proposition of the case to act in accordance with a duty not agreed upon by them .

This will fiddle to speculations of the court acting in a biased materialization since it would often result to a case where the other political party is forced to perform something favorable to the other . The courts should weigh all circumstance by listening and asking for evidence from both parties with equal opportunities given on both sides . It would be bad to force the other party to act in detect with an alleged agreement where the evidence clearly points to the fact that much(prenominal) was not freely and voluntarily agreed upon by both partiesIt would however...If you extremity to get a f! ull essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper