Big Five Model of Leadership

king-size Five Model of LeadershipYONGKUN LI base on the results of your individualisedity test, what do extant research joint your lead may or may not be bid? Do you agree or disagree with the research findings? Identify few ways which you may be able to better develop your leadership potential.Is the leader born or made? For years, people was arguing almost this question. With the development of the society, every organization or companies demand different skills and own(prenominal) qualities in its leadership. Some researchers who advocate that personality traits argon related to leadership emergence or effectiveness. In this essay, I will discuss the alliance between personality and leadership.There ar different definitions of leadership wealthy person been presented over the years (Bass, 1998). Most definitions include one or more(prenominal) of the elements of goal achievement, teamwork or organization, and social reactions. According to Hogg, M (2001), leadersh ip is a group process generated by loving categorization and depersonalization processes associated with the social identity. In an otherwise word, leadership is kind of an ability to get other people to do what you want them to, unstrainedly (Sendjaya, S., SpringerLink, 2015).However, leadership is kind of personal traits. According to Mayer, personality refers to individual differences in characteristic patterns of thinking, feeling and behaving (2015). Based on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), everyone has a natural leadership modality that related to their personality types. The more consistent the characteristic and the more much it occurs in diverse situations, the more important the trait. When executives position changing into hot roles or environments, it may need to explore or rein in different facets of their personality.The famous theory study about personality is Big Five model, including openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neurotic ism.NeuroticismNeuroticism reflects the individual emotional adaptation process. High neuroticism individuals tend to have psychological stress, unrealistic thoughts, excessive demands and violence impulses. And it is more likely to experience negative emotions such as anger, anxiety, depression and so on. On the contrary, people with low neuroticism haemorrhoid are less troubled, less emotional, and more stable.OpennessOpenness gist that generous heart, bold, adventurous, and dislike familiar things or routine. It is described as a persons cognitive style. It has different lookings of openness. The openness of experience is defined as pursuit and understanding of experience proactively. It compares curious, novel, non-traditional, and creative individuals with those that are traditional, non-artistic, and non-analytical. Openness people privilege abstract thinking, a wide range of interests. Closed people are practical, preferring, more traditional and conservative. Leaders w ith this tendency should be working more on openness and push themselves out of their comfort zone. extroversionExtroversion can be advantageous in leadership. It represents the number and density of interpersonal interactions, the need for excitement, and the ability to be pleasant. This trait contrasts cross social, active, individual-oriented and silent, serious, shy, and quiet among people. It aspect can be measured by two qualities interpersonal and vitality. The former assesses the compass point to which individuals like others, while the latter reflects individual rhythms and vitality levels. trounce people like to contact with others, full of vitality, often feel compulsory emotions. They are passionate, like sports, like to stimulate adventure. In a group, they are very talkative, confident, would be attracted by the attention of others. On the other hand, invaginate people are relatively quiet, cautious, do not like in like manner much contact with the outside world.A greeablenessExtroversion is to assess the degree of individual likes with others, while the agreeableness examines the attitudes to others. It including, on the one hand, close, compassionate, trustworthy, lenient and soft-hearted. On the other hand, it including hostile, cynical, manipulative, vengeful and ruthless. Those who are agreeableness are satisfied, friendly, generous, helpful and willing to give up their interests for others.For some positions, too high agreeableness is not necessary, especially tough and objective judgments, such as scientists, critics, and soldiers.painstakingnessConscientiousness refers to our control, manage and regulate our own impulsive way of assessing an individual goal-oriented manner on the organization, persistence, and motivation. It compares the trustworthy, exquisite individual and the lazy, sloppy among individuals. One risk for passing conscientious is that their perfectionism can cause them to lose sight of the big picture. On the other hand, individuals who tend to be more responsibility and flexible would puzzle right decisions, which can get them earn more trust.ReferencesBass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Hogg, M. (2001). A Social Identity Theory of Leadership. Personality and Social psychology Review, 5(3), 184-200.Mayer, J. (2015). The personality systems framework Current theory and development. Journal of Research in Personality,56, 4.Sendjaya, S., SpringerLink. (2015). Personal and organizational excellence through servant leadership larn to serve, serving to lead, leading to transform (Management for professionals).