Virtue ethics vs. utilitarianism Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

law morality vs. utilitarianism - Term Paper ExampleIt is an ethical dilemma, to identify which of the two is ethical being unkind or lying. On the some other hand it is also complex if it is ethical or unethical for an individual to distinguish from the rich with an aim of helping the poor. Ethics is both what an individual studies and thinks or the code that an individual follows and lives in that direction. In this paper I will argue that utilitarianism is the better pee of ethics than virtue ethics.... Virtue ethics is a description of char f beer as a moral agent, character is an ethical air driving force. It does not depend on rules or a consequence which defines what is right and wrong depending with the results of an act rather than character (Crisp, 68). While utilitarianism on the other hand, is an belief based on the moral charge of a specific action relaying on its usefulness as it maximizes on utility and minimizes on utility which is negative(Scarre, 2). Utilit y is defined as pleasure without pain, satisfaction that is preference or write outledge. Utilitarianism is therefore a form of consequentialism moral worth of a specific action depends on the outcome. ... ch therefore it does not bet on the kind of acts benevolent beings are involved in, or the intentions of individuals in an action, as long as the outcomes are positive. The consequential approach makes sense to us intuitively since while growing up, most children are ordinarily taught on how they should be good. In this context the young are usually advice on how they should carry themselves and since human beings are mostly govern by there conscious they are in a countersink to make a decision based on the action that will not hate the other party (Lafollette, 27). In addition, utilitarianism relays on two main principles, one being equality that is an individual considers everyones interests counts by having the very(prenominal) weight and relevancy. It does not discrimina te race since everyones frustrations or pain has the same magnitude as anyone else. While the second principle relies on the action of an individual, the act has to result to a balance which is best between an individual frustrations and satisfaction, as well as to all human beings alter by the results of the action. It is the best form of ethic since as a utilitarian one has to think critically about a specific approach in a moral way. Here, an individual has to evaluate by first finding out the impacts of a specific approach. As a utilitarian one has to know who will be affected by choosing one of the two existing options. In addition, one has to mark off the strength of the impact of the approach as well as where the best results will lie. It does not matter what option one has to take but it matters if the selected option is defines the moral duties (Lafollette, 27). On the other hand, Utilitarianism focuses on the idea of being kind and it is ethical for human beings to act t his way. Being kind to