The BP gulf oil spill Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The BP gulf oil color spill - Assignment ExampleThe BP gulf oil spill As a result of the explosion, 4.9 millions barrels of crude oil were released into the surrounding water forwards the wells were capped in July. The spilt oil caused considerable damage to the wildlife and marine animals. Similarly, on July 6th 2011, it was describe that ExxonMobil had spill around a 1000 barrels of oil into the Yellowstone River on the coast of Montana as an underground pipeline under the river bed ruptured. While ExxonMobil has taken on the responsibility of cleaning the river and either damage caused, the question arises whether the government has done enough to protect the environment from further such disasters. surely after the BP oil spill, such a disaster should not have occurred, especi aloney barely a year after the last one. What did the government do in cleared of the first disaster, and what will they be doing after this one? If these companies are drilling for oil, they are nat urally doing it with the consent of the government, who are in writhe doing it for the betterment of the citizens. But if they are doing so, do they not have a responsibility to ensure that all risk of the cost of doing so is reduced and minimal? And if it is indeed their responsibility to do so, in the light of the event that failure to do so has occurred time and again, what is the government doing to prevent further such mistakes. more than importantly, why do these mistakes occur, time and again. When investigation was carried out into the causes behind the BP oil spill it was found that had unnoted several factors, that had they been correctly addressed might have prevented the accident2. For the sake of cutting back on costs, BP, Halliburton and Transocean had worked on a lower budget, thereby compromising on quality control. For example. BP had overlooked the strength of the cement world used in the walls of the pipes, as well as incorrectly cementing the walls of the pi pes34. Furthermore, the failed result of several pressure tests were in like manner ignored, which had they been properly addressed, might have prevented the ultimate bursting of the well. But while BP was considerably criticized for their faults in preventing the oil spill, the fact was that the US government also missed considerable chances to prevent the attack and then later on further receptions in light of the attack5. For one thing, officials initially underestimated the threat of a leak, taking on the term of BP officials when they were asked about it a year earlier6. Once the leak occurred, they underestimated the extent of the leak. They was assumed that oil on the muster of the water was merely that on the surface. It was not understood that it was spilling from an underground source, and thereby spread not wholly on the surface but rather throughout the water. As a result of this underestimation, the government treat the need for critical action, trusting the word of the company that said would take care of it. Oil critics evidence that government officials rely on oil companies to manage the oil spills, meaning they do not go into the investigation personally by going on site or into an in-depth investigation, thereby making their response to the spill inadequate. Critics also say that the government should not trust that companies have enough resources to judge in advance whether a risk exists and then once it occurs, whether they have the resources to take care of it. In the light that it doesnt, the government sh