Victimless Crimes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Victimless Crimes - Essay ExampleA good example of this train of thought is interpreted from a Speech at Cornell Law SchoolOne needs to completely rid oneself of the covetousness for cash to see that harlotry, although legalized, can never be a legitimate business because it will invariably be associated with crime, corruption, class, mass informal exploitation and human trafficking.Most commonly the list of activities and conduct forbid by most repressive legal structures include, whoredom, obscenity, nudity, and incest, erotica (pornography), and sodomy (consensual oral or anal sexual activity). The philosophical basis of this dichotomy of views is profound. To the libertarian perspective the individual and his or her pay offs are paramount. Its absolutist position is presented right clearly in the National Platform of the Libertarian Party (adopted at its July 2002 convention in Indianapolis, Indiana) http//www.lp.org/issues/platform/victcrim.html, which includes, in regards to consensual sexual activity, the languageVictimless Crimes - Because only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes, we estimation the repeal of all federal, state, and local laws creating crimes without victims. In particular, we advocate the repeal of all laws regarding consensual sexual relations, including prostitution and solicitation, and the cessation of state oppression and harassment of homosexual men and women, that they, at last, be accorded their full rights as individuals the repeal of all laws regulating or prohibiting the possession, use, sale, production, or distribution of sexually explicit material, independent of socially redeeming value or compliance with community standardsProhibition Curiously enough the prohibitionist side can count under its banner two groups that we might ordinarily considered to be at odds, upholders of conventional religious morality and insurgent feminist ideologues. It is within the categorical dich otomy between these two viewpoints that we must examine to discover a reasonable reply to the primary question given.In our society the diehard view posits the society as paramount, the entity calling for the most dignity, respect and consideration. In this way the argument goes a loosening of sexual restrictions will lead to the destruction of traditional marriage and the unleashing upon society of hordes of unattached males who, as everyone knows, are only interested in one thing. It is particularly in regards to the question of prostitution that this idea is most prominent. The reasoning goes like this why would a man stay with support and cling to a single woman, with all the disadvantages that such behavior entails when he could be free to follow his instincts and bonk himself without consequence. This viewpoint goes further to claim that the family structure is the primary bulwark of society itself, and therefore prostitution should be prohibited.The feminist take on this approach is a question from and